<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ILoveSoFla.com &#187; Luxury Real Estate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ilovesofla.com/tag/luxury-real-estate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ilovesofla.com</link>
	<description>South Florida Real Estate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 17:29:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Luxury Homes Sales &#8211; EWM is #1</title>
		<link>http://ilovesofla.com/2010/07/02/luxury-homes-sales-ewm-is-1/</link>
		<comments>http://ilovesofla.com/2010/07/02/luxury-homes-sales-ewm-is-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 19:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jenniferwollmann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Buying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luxury Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Selling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miami Real Estate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ilovesofla.com/?p=14121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a id="aptureLink_KO9IWy29ff" href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/33834133"><img style="border: 0px none" src="http://placeholder.apture.com/ph/660x390_ScribdItem/" alt="" width="660px" height="390px" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ilovesofla.com/2010/07/02/luxury-homes-sales-ewm-is-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Miami Dade Real Estate:  Pending Sales in the Million $ and Up Price Range Surge 67%</title>
		<link>http://ilovesofla.com/2010/03/12/miami-dade-real-estate-pending-sales-in-the-million-and-up-price-range-surge-67/</link>
		<comments>http://ilovesofla.com/2010/03/12/miami-dade-real-estate-pending-sales-in-the-million-and-up-price-range-surge-67/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jenniferwollmann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Market Summary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luxury Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miami Real Estate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ilovesofla.com/?p=13988</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
&#8220;PENDING SALES in the $1,000,000+ price range for the entire  MLS are up 67% in Miami-Dade and 8% in Broward for  the Dec09 to Feb10 period vs. the Dec08 to Feb09 period.  EWM has averaged CLOSING one sale in  excess of $1,000,000 every other day for the past 90 days!  ALL PRICE  RANGE PENDINGS in the MLS [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><strong><span><span style="font-size: x-small"> </span></span></strong></p>
<div><span><span style="font-size: medium"><strong>&#8220;</strong>PENDING SALES in the $1,000,000+ price range for the entire  MLS are up 67% in Miami-Dade and 8% in Broward for  the Dec09</span><span style="font-size: medium"> to Feb10</span><span style="font-size: medium"> period vs. the Dec08</span><span style="font-size: medium"> to Feb09</span><span style="font-size: medium"> period.  EWM</span><span style="font-size: medium"> has averaged CLOSING one sale in  excess of $1,000,000 <span style="text-decoration: underline">every other day</span> for the past 90 days!  ALL PRICE  RANGE PENDINGS</span><span style="font-size: medium"> in the MLS are up 54% in  Miami-Dade and 67% in Broward for the same period comparison&#8221;</span></span></div>
<p><strong><span><span style="font-size: x-small"> </span><span style="font-size: x-small"> </span></span></strong></div>
<div><strong><span style="font-family: Arial"><span style="font-size: x-small">Ronald A.  Shuffield</span></span></strong></div>
<div><strong><span style="font-family: arial;font-size: x-small">President</span></strong></div>
<div><strong><span style="font-family: arial;font-size: x-small"><span style="font-family: arial;font-size: x-small"> </span><a href="http://ewm.com/company/"><span style="font-family: arial;font-size: x-small"><span style="font-family: arial;font-size: x-small">Esslinger</span></span>-Wooten-Maxwell  Realtors</a></span></strong></div>
<div><strong><span style="font-family: arial;font-size: xx-small"><em>A HomeServices of America  Company</em></span></strong></div>
<div><strong><span style="font-family: arial;font-size: xx-small"><em>An Affiliate of Berkshire  Hathaway</em></span></strong></div>
<div><span> </span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ilovesofla.com/2010/03/12/miami-dade-real-estate-pending-sales-in-the-million-and-up-price-range-surge-67/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>South Beach Real Estate &#8211; Continuum Condo Market Update</title>
		<link>http://ilovesofla.com/2009/12/07/south-beach-real-estate-continuum-condo-market-update/</link>
		<comments>http://ilovesofla.com/2009/12/07/south-beach-real-estate-continuum-condo-market-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 17:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jenniferwollmann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Buying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Summary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miami Beach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Selling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luxury Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miami Beach Condos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miami Beach Real Estate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ilovesofla.com/?p=13612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[// 
This gorgeous oceanfront development on 12 acres is a  true vacation destination, even if you live here year round!  The Continuum, in  Miami Beach&#8217;s South of Fifth neighborhood, currently consists of two condo  towers and several lofts. The North Tower is 50 S Pointe Drive and the South  Tower is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--     /* default css */  table {   font-size: 1em;   line-height: inherit;   border-collapse: collapse; }   tr {      text-align: left;    }   div, address, ol, ul, li, option, select {   margin-top: 0px;   margin-bottom: 0px; }  p {   margin: 0px; }   pre {   font-family: Courier New;   white-space: pre-wrap;   margin:0; }  body {   margin: 6px;   padding: 0px;   font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;   font-size: 10pt;   background-color: #ffffff; }   img {   -moz-force-broken-image-icon: 1; }  @media screen {   html.pageview {     background-color: #f3f3f3 !important;     overflow-x: hidden;     overflow-y: scroll;   }        body {     min-height: 1100px;          counter-reset: __goog_page__;   }   * html body {     height: 1100px;   }   .pageview body {     border-top: 1px solid #ccc;     border-left: 1px solid #ccc;     border-right: 2px solid #bbb;     border-bottom: 2px solid #bbb;     width: 648px !important;     margin: 15px auto 25px;     padding: 40px 50px;   }   /* IE6 */   * html {     overflow-y: scroll;   }   * html.pageview body {     overflow-x: auto;   }   /* Prevent repaint errors when scrolling in Safari. This "Star-7" css hack      targets Safari 3.1, but not WebKit nightlies and presumably Safari 4.      That's OK because this bug is fixed in WebKit nightlies/Safari 4 :-). */   html*#wys_frame::before {     content: '\A0';     position: fixed;     overflow: hidden;     width: 0;     height: 0;     top: 0;     left: 0;   }                    .writely-callout-data {       display: inline-block;       width: 0;       height: 0;       overflow: hidden;     }           .writely-footnote-marker {       background-image: url('images/footnote_doc_icon.gif');       background-color: transparent;       background-repeat: no-repeat;       width: 7px;       overflow: hidden;       height: 16px;       vertical-align: top;               -moz-user-select: none;     }     .editor .writely-footnote-marker {       cursor: move;     }     .writely-footnote-marker-highlight {       background-position: -15px 0;       -moz-user-select: text;     }     .writely-footnote-hide-selection ::-moz-selection, .writely-footnote-hide-selection::-moz-selection {       background: transparent;     }     .writely-footnote-hide-selection ::selection, .writely-footnote-hide-selection::selection {       background: transparent;     }     .writely-footnote-hide-selection {       cursor: move;     }      /* Comments */     .writely-comment-yellow {       background-color: #ffffd7;     }     .writely-comment-orange {       background-color: #ffe3c0;     }     .writely-comment-pink {       background-color: #ffd7ff;     }     .writely-comment-green {       background-color: #d7ffd7;     }     .writely-comment-blue {       background-color: #d7ffff;     }     .writely-comment-purple {       background-color: #eed7ff;     }            .br_fix span+br:not(:-moz-last-node) {          position:relative;          left: -1ex        }       #cb-p-tgt {     font-size: 8pt;     padding: .4em;     background-color: #ddd;     color: #333;   }   #cb-p-tgt-can {     text-decoration: underline;     color: #36c;     font-weight: bold;     margin-left: 2em;   }   #cb-p-tgt .spin {     width: 16px;     height: 16px;     background: url(//ssl.gstatic.com/docs/clipboard/spin_16o.gif) no-repeat;   } }  h6 { font-size: 8pt } h5 { font-size: 8pt } h4 { font-size: 10pt } h3 { font-size: 12pt } h2 { font-size: 14pt } h1 { font-size: 18pt }  blockquote {padding: 10px; border: 1px #DDD dashed }  .webkit-indent-blockquote { border: none; }  a img {border: 0}  .pb {   border-width: 0;   page-break-after: always;   /* We don't want this to be resizeable, so enforce a width and height      using !important */   height: 1px !important;   width: 100% !important; }  .editor .pb {   border-top: 1px dashed #C0C0C0;   border-bottom: 1px dashed #C0C0C0; }  div.google_header, div.google_footer {   position: relative;   margin-top: 1em;   margin-bottom: 1em; }   /* Table of contents */ .editor div.writely-toc {   background-color: #f3f3f3;   border: 1px solid #ccc; } .writely-toc &gt; ol {   padding-left: 3em;   font-weight: bold; } ol.writely-toc-subheading {   padding-left: 1em;   font-weight: normal; } /* IE6 only */ * html writely-toc ol {   list-style-position: inside; } .writely-toc-none {   list-style-type: none; } .writely-toc-decimal {   list-style-type: decimal; } .writely-toc-upper-alpha {   list-style-type: upper-alpha; } .writely-toc-lower-alpha {   list-style-type: lower-alpha; } .writely-toc-upper-roman {   list-style-type: upper-roman; } .writely-toc-lower-roman {   list-style-type: lower-roman; } .writely-toc-disc {   list-style-type: disc; }  /* Ordered lists converted to numbered lists can preserve ordered types, and    vice versa. This is confusing, so disallow it */ ul[type="i"], ul[type="I"], ul[type="1"], ul[type="a"], ul[type="A"] {   list-style-type: disc; }  ol[type="disc"], ol[type="circle"], ol[type="square"] {   list-style-type: decimal; }  /* end default css */    /* custom css */   /* end custom css */  /* ui edited css */  body {   font-family: Verdana;      font-size: 10.0pt;   line-height: normal;   background-color: #ffffff; } /* end ui edited css */   /* editor CSS */ .editor a:visited {color: #551A8B} .editor table.zeroBorder {border: 1px dotted gray} .editor table.zeroBorder td {border: 1px dotted gray} .editor table.zeroBorder th {border: 1px dotted gray}   .editor div.google_header, .editor div.google_footer {   border: 2px #DDDDDD dashed;   position: static;   width: 100%;   min-height: 2em; }  .editor .misspell {background-color: yellow}  .editor .writely-comment {   font-size: 9pt;   line-height: 1.4;   padding: 1px;   border: 1px dashed #C0C0C0 }   /* end editor CSS */ --><script type="text/javascript">// </script></p>
<p>This gorgeous oceanfront development on 12 acres is a  true vacation destination, even if you live here year round!  The Continuum, in  Miami Beach&#8217;s South of Fifth neighborhood, currently consists of two condo  towers and several lofts. The North Tower is 50 S Pointe Drive and the South  Tower is 100 S Pointe drive.</p>
<p>The market information as of today for <strong>2 bedroom units</strong> in<strong> </strong>each of the  two towers is as follows:</p>
<p><!--     /* default css */  table {   font-size: 1em;   line-height: inherit;   border-collapse: collapse; }   tr {      text-align: left;    }   div, address, ol, ul, li, option, select {   margin-top: 0px;   margin-bottom: 0px; }  p {   margin: 0px; }   pre {   font-family: Courier New;   white-space: pre-wrap;   margin:0; }  body {   margin: 6px;   padding: 0px;   font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;   font-size: 10pt;   background-color: #ffffff; }   img {   -moz-force-broken-image-icon: 1; }  @media screen {   html.pageview {     background-color: #f3f3f3 !important;     overflow-x: hidden;     overflow-y: scroll;   }        body {     min-height: 1100px;          counter-reset: __goog_page__;   }   * html body {     height: 1100px;   }   .pageview body {     border-top: 1px solid #ccc;     border-left: 1px solid #ccc;     border-right: 2px solid #bbb;     border-bottom: 2px solid #bbb;     width: 648px !important;     margin: 15px auto 25px;     padding: 40px 50px;   }   /* IE6 */   * html {     overflow-y: scroll;   }   * html.pageview body {     overflow-x: auto;   }   /* Prevent repaint errors when scrolling in Safari. This "Star-7" css hack      targets Safari 3.1, but not WebKit nightlies and presumably Safari 4.      That's OK because this bug is fixed in WebKit nightlies/Safari 4 :-). */   html*#wys_frame::before {     content: '\A0';     position: fixed;     overflow: hidden;     width: 0;     height: 0;     top: 0;     left: 0;   }                    .writely-callout-data {       display: inline-block;       width: 0;       height: 0;       overflow: hidden;     }           .writely-footnote-marker {       background-image: url('images/footnote_doc_icon.gif');       background-color: transparent;       background-repeat: no-repeat;       width: 7px;       overflow: hidden;       height: 16px;       vertical-align: top;               -moz-user-select: none;     }     .editor .writely-footnote-marker {       cursor: move;     }     .writely-footnote-marker-highlight {       background-position: -15px 0;       -moz-user-select: text;     }     .writely-footnote-hide-selection ::-moz-selection, .writely-footnote-hide-selection::-moz-selection {       background: transparent;     }     .writely-footnote-hide-selection ::selection, .writely-footnote-hide-selection::selection {       background: transparent;     }     .writely-footnote-hide-selection {       cursor: move;     }      /* Comments */     .writely-comment-yellow {       background-color: #ffffd7;     }     .writely-comment-orange {       background-color: #ffe3c0;     }     .writely-comment-pink {       background-color: #ffd7ff;     }     .writely-comment-green {       background-color: #d7ffd7;     }     .writely-comment-blue {       background-color: #d7ffff;     }     .writely-comment-purple {       background-color: #eed7ff;     }            .br_fix span+br:not(:-moz-last-node) {          position:relative;          left: -1ex        }       #cb-p-tgt {     font-size: 8pt;     padding: .4em;     background-color: #ddd;     color: #333;   }   #cb-p-tgt-can {     text-decoration: underline;     color: #36c;     font-weight: bold;     margin-left: 2em;   }   #cb-p-tgt .spin {     width: 16px;     height: 16px;     background: url(//ssl.gstatic.com/docs/clipboard/spin_16o.gif) no-repeat;   } }  h6 { font-size: 8pt } h5 { font-size: 8pt } h4 { font-size: 10pt } h3 { font-size: 12pt } h2 { font-size: 14pt } h1 { font-size: 18pt }  blockquote {padding: 10px; border: 1px #DDD dashed }  .webkit-indent-blockquote { border: none; }  a img {border: 0}  .pb {   border-width: 0;   page-break-after: always;   /* We don't want this to be resizeable, so enforce a width and height      using !important */   height: 1px !important;   width: 100% !important; }  .editor .pb {   border-top: 1px dashed #C0C0C0;   border-bottom: 1px dashed #C0C0C0; }  div.google_header, div.google_footer {   position: relative;   margin-top: 1em;   margin-bottom: 1em; }   /* Table of contents */ .editor div.writely-toc {   background-color: #f3f3f3;   border: 1px solid #ccc; } .writely-toc &gt; ol {   padding-left: 3em;   font-weight: bold; } ol.writely-toc-subheading {   padding-left: 1em;   font-weight: normal; } /* IE6 only */ * html writely-toc ol {   list-style-position: inside; } .writely-toc-none {   list-style-type: none; } .writely-toc-decimal {   list-style-type: decimal; } .writely-toc-upper-alpha {   list-style-type: upper-alpha; } .writely-toc-lower-alpha {   list-style-type: lower-alpha; } .writely-toc-upper-roman {   list-style-type: upper-roman; } .writely-toc-lower-roman {   list-style-type: lower-roman; } .writely-toc-disc {   list-style-type: disc; }  /* Ordered lists converted to numbered lists can preserve ordered types, and    vice versa. This is confusing, so disallow it */ ul[type="i"], ul[type="I"], ul[type="1"], ul[type="a"], ul[type="A"] {   list-style-type: disc; }  ol[type="disc"], ol[type="circle"], ol[type="square"] {   list-style-type: decimal; }  /* end default css */    /* custom css */   /* end custom css */  /* ui edited css */  body {   font-family: Verdana;      font-size: 10.0pt;   line-height: normal;   background-color: #ffffff; } /* end ui edited css */   /* editor CSS */ .editor a:visited {color: #551A8B} .editor table.zeroBorder {border: 1px dotted gray} .editor table.zeroBorder td {border: 1px dotted gray} .editor table.zeroBorder th {border: 1px dotted gray}   .editor div.google_header, .editor div.google_footer {   border: 2px #DDDDDD dashed;   position: static;   width: 100%;   min-height: 2em; }  .editor .misspell {background-color: yellow}  .editor .writely-comment {   font-size: 9pt;   line-height: 1.4;   padding: 1px;   border: 1px dashed #C0C0C0 }   /* end editor CSS */ --><script type="text/javascript">// &lt;![CDATA[// </script></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-family: arial"><span style="font-family: Verdana"><span style="font-size: x-small">The average price  per square foot for 2 bedrooms sold this year in 50 S Pointe is $ 716.  At 100 S  Pointe the average is $652.</span></span></span></li>
</ul>
<ul style="font-family: Arial">
<li><span style="font-family: Arial;color: #000000"><span style="font-family: Verdana"><span style="font-size: x-small">36 2-bedroom units currently for sale in Continuum  (both towers)</span></span></span></li>
<li>
<div><span style="font-family: arial"><span style="font-family: Verdana"><span style="font-size: x-small">17 in 50 S  Pointe (2008)</span></span></span></div>
</li>
<li>
<div><span style="font-family: arial"><span style="font-family: Verdana"><span style="font-size: x-small">19 in 100 S  Pointe (2002)</span></span></span></div>
</li>
<li>
<div><span style="font-family: arial"><span style="font-family: Verdana"><span style="font-size: x-small">4 are  townhomes/lofts</span></span></span></div>
</li>
<li>
<div><span style="font-family: arial"><span style="font-family: Verdana"><span style="font-size: x-small">Highest list  price is $3.299 million for a townhouse</span></span></span></div>
</li>
<li>
<div><span style="font-family: arial"><span style="font-family: Verdana"><span style="font-size: x-small">Lowest list  price is $1,150,000 for unit 1901 at 100 S  Pointe</span></span></span></div>
</li>
<li>
<div><span style="font-family: arial"><span style="font-family: Verdana"><span style="font-size: x-small">9 2-bedroom  units have sold this year in 50 S Pointe.   Highest sales price was for Loft-1.   It sold for $1,700,000, $732 per square foot, on 9/29.  The lowest sale was unit  805. It sold on Sept. 25 for $900,000 or $452 per square foot.  Highest per  square foot price $838 for unit 1404.  Lowest price per square foot was unit 805  at $452.  There are currently no pending sales in 50 S  Pointe.</span></span></span></div>
</li>
<li>
<div><span style="font-family: arial"><span style="font-family: Verdana"><span style="font-size: x-small">10 2-bedroom  units have sold this year in 100 S Pointe.  Highest price was unit 804 at  $2,325,000 or $1014 per square foot.  Lowest was unit 605 at $940,000 or $502  per square foot.  Those are also the highest and lowest prices on a square foot  basis.  There are two pending sales.  One is listed at $1034 per square foot the  other at $931.</span></span></span></div>
</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ilovesofla.com/2009/12/07/south-beach-real-estate-continuum-condo-market-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ocean Reef Club &#8211; Vintage Weekend</title>
		<link>http://ilovesofla.com/2009/11/20/ocean-reef-club-vintage-weekend/</link>
		<comments>http://ilovesofla.com/2009/11/20/ocean-reef-club-vintage-weekend/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jenniferwollmann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Luxury Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marinas, Yacht Clubs and other Boating Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Things To Do]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Things to do in Miami]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ilovesofla.com/?p=13540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ocean Reef Club will be holding its 15th annual Vintage Weekend, sure to delight automobile, yacht, and plane enthusiasts, from Thursday, December 3  through Sunday, December 6.  This is only open to club members and registered guests staying at the Inn and is sure to fill up quickly.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ocean Reef Club will be holding its 15th annual <a href="http://oceanreef.com/Happenings-and-Events/Vintage-Weekend-25.html">Vintage Weekend</a>, sure to delight automobile, yacht, and plane enthusiasts, from Thursday, December 3  through Sunday, December 6.  This is only open to club members and registered guests staying at the Inn and is sure to fill up quickly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ilovesofla.com/2009/11/20/ocean-reef-club-vintage-weekend/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>South Florida Luxury Home Buyers Have Plenty of Buying Opportunities</title>
		<link>http://ilovesofla.com/2009/08/27/south-florida-luxury-home-buyers-have-plenty-of-buying-opportunities/</link>
		<comments>http://ilovesofla.com/2009/08/27/south-florida-luxury-home-buyers-have-plenty-of-buying-opportunities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 12:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Wollmann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Buying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coral Gables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Key Biscayne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luxury Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Summary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miami Beach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Selling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coral Gables Luxury Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miami Beach Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miami Real Estate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ilovesofla.com/?p=13249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Forbes&#8217; America&#8217;s Most Expensive ZIP Codes, South Florida luxury real estate is not faring too badly, compared with states like California.  Granted, California has more expensive ZIPS according to the statistics used by Forbes and almost all of those ZIP codes show a decrease in price, but still, only four South Florida ZIPs [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to <a title="America's Most Expensive ZIP Codes" href="http://www.forbes.com/2009/08/26/most-expensive-zip-codes-lifestyle-real-estate-zips.html">Forbes&#8217; America&#8217;s Most Expensive ZIP Codes</a>, South Florida luxury real estate is not faring too badly, compared with states like California.  Granted, California has more expensive ZIPS according to the statistics used by Forbes and almost all of those ZIP codes show a decrease in price, but still, only four South Florida ZIPs made the top <a title="Forbes Top 500 Most Expensive ZIP Codes" href="http://www.forbes.com/2009/08/26/most-expensive-zip-codes-lifestyle-real-estate-zip_full-list.html">500 list</a> and only one, <a title="Fisher Island, FL Market Statistics" href="http://www.forbes.com/zipcodes/2009/zipspage.html?zip=33109&amp;city=Miami Beach">Fisher Island&#8217;s 33109</a> made the top 100 list.</p>
<p>Others on the list included <a title="Key Biscayne, FL Market Statistics" href="http://www.forbes.com/zipcodes/2009/zipspage.html?zip=33149&amp;city=Key Biscayne">Key Biscayne 33149</a> at number 199,<a title="Coral Gabbles, FL Market Statistics" href="http://www.forbes.com/zipcodes/2009/zipspage.html?zip=33146&amp;city=Coral Gables"> Coral Gables 33146</a> at number 363 and <a title="Miami Beach, FL Market Statistics" href="http://www.forbes.com/zipcodes/2009/zipspage.html?zip=33154&amp;city=Miami Beach">Miami Beach 33154</a>, which includes Indian Creek Village, Bay Harbor Islands, Bal Harbour, and Surfside, at number 494.</p>
<p>These South Florida cities have a high inventory, which will put a downward pressure on prices.  The only city that did not see a decrease in it&#8217;s median home price was Coral Gables.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ilovesofla.com/2009/08/27/south-florida-luxury-home-buyers-have-plenty-of-buying-opportunities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Which Florida Cities Will Rank As Most Expensive in 2009?</title>
		<link>http://ilovesofla.com/2009/06/30/which-florida-cities-will-rank-as-most-expensive-in-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://ilovesofla.com/2009/06/30/which-florida-cities-will-rank-as-most-expensive-in-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 03:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jenniferwollmann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Buying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luxury Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Selling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Add new tag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miami Beach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miami Beach Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miami Real Estate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ilovesofla.com/?p=13106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last year, Forbes&#8217; 500 most expensive zip codes list included 11 in Florida, including the number 1 most expensive zip, 33109 in Miami Beach, with a median sales price of $3,850,000!  Miami Beach also ranked #369 with zip code 33154 which had a median home price of $745,900.  The list was based on sales between [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last year, <a href="http://www.forbes.com/lists/2008/7/forbeslife-cx_richzipcodes08_Most-Expensive-ZIP-Codes_State_12.html">Forbes&#8217; 500 most expensive zip codes list</a> included 11 in Florida, including the number 1 most expensive zip, 33109 in Miami Beach, with a <strong>median</strong> sales price of $3,850,000!  Miami Beach also ranked #369 with zip code 33154 which had a median home price of $745,900.  The list was based on sales between July of 2007 and June 2008, so it will be interesting to see what changes this year&#8217;s list holds for Florida cities.  Stay tuned, the list should be out in the next couple of months and I will post the results with a more detailed analysis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ilovesofla.com/2009/06/30/which-florida-cities-will-rank-as-most-expensive-in-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Luxury Real Estate &#8211; Coral Gables in the Top 5 of Fastest Moving Luxury Neighborhoods</title>
		<link>http://ilovesofla.com/2009/06/09/luxury-real-estate-coral-gables-in-the-top-5-of-fastest-moving-luxury-neighborhood/</link>
		<comments>http://ilovesofla.com/2009/06/09/luxury-real-estate-coral-gables-in-the-top-5-of-fastest-moving-luxury-neighborhood/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 03:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jenniferwollmann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Buying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coral Gables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luxury Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Selling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coral Gables Luxury Real Estate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ilovesofla.com/?p=13102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent Forbes article rated Coral Gables, FL as one of the fastest moving luxury neighborhoods in terms of days on market.  Forbes&#8217; rating system, which is based on the 500 most expensive zip codes,  is better than other housing indexes which cover too broad of an area to give an accurate picture of what [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A recent <a href="http://www.forbes.com/2009/04/22/zip-codes-sales-lifestyle-real-estate-home-sales.html">Forbes</a> article rated <a href="http://www.citybeautiful.net/CGWeb/residents.aspx">Coral Gables, FL</a> as one of the fastest moving luxury neighborhoods in terms of days on <a href="http://ilovesofla.com/files/2009/06/gables-white-house2.jpeg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-13111" src="http://ilovesofla.com/files/2009/06/gables-white-house2-300x225.jpg" alt="gables-white-house2" width="300" height="225" /></a>market.  Forbes&#8217; rating system, which is based on the 500 most expensive zip codes,  is better than other housing indexes which cover too broad of an area to give an accurate picture of what is happening in a specific neighborhood,  but their assessment also has some flaws.  For example,  for Coral Gables, which was rated number 5 by Forbes, the zip code they used was 33146.  Don&#8217;t get me wrong, 33146 is an expensive zip code, but Coral Gables, which extends significantly further South from the better known business and restaurant district which is their formal downtown, has 7 zip codes!  Based on an MLS search today, there were 69 Active listings ranging in price from $13.5 million down to $395,000 in the 33146 zip code.  14 of those listings were waterfront.  However, there were a total of 261 Active MLS listings in the Gables, South of US 1.  The most expensive listing was $49.5 million and was in the 33143 zip code, which also had higher closed sales prices.  Having Forbes rate Coral Gables the 5th fastest moving luxury market, with an average of 66 days for the top 10 zips vs 115 days average for the whole 500 index,  is great news for Coral Gables, but it doesn&#8217;t tell the story for luxury real estate in the Gables.  There were several zips and luxury price ranges which had significantly longer days on market.  When pricing your luxury home for sale or making an offer on your purchase of one, make sure you check with a local luxury expert.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ilovesofla.com/2009/06/09/luxury-real-estate-coral-gables-in-the-top-5-of-fastest-moving-luxury-neighborhood/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>